top of page

Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Partnership Agreements

 

Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Partnership Agreements

Entering into a partnership can be an excellent way to pool resources, expertise, and capital for mutual business success. However, without a strong, clear, and enforceable partnership agreement, conflicts can arise, potentially leading to legal disputes or dissolution of the partnership. To protect all parties involved, it is essential to understand common mistakes in partnership agreements and implement best practices to create robust agreements. This article discusses common pitfalls and offers practical tips for drafting effective partnership agreements under the Malaysian Partnership Act 1961.


1. Failure to Define Partnership Roles and Responsibilities


One of the most common mistakes in partnership agreements is the lack of clear definitions regarding each partner's roles, responsibilities, and authority. Ambiguities can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts, especially when making critical business decisions.


  • Section 26(a) of the Partnership Act 1961 states that all partners are entitled to share equally in the management of the business, unless otherwise agreed. To avoid disputes, specify each partner's responsibilities and decision-making authority in the agreement. Clearly define who handles daily operations, financial management, marketing, or other essential functions.


2. Inadequate Provisions for Profit Sharing and Loss Allocation


Partners often neglect to clearly outline how profits and losses will be shared. Assumptions or verbal agreements can lead to disagreements, particularly if one partner feels they are contributing more than another.


  • According to Section 26(a), partners share profits and contribute to losses equally unless a different arrangement is specified. It's crucial to include a detailed clause on profit distribution and loss sharing, reflecting each partner's investment, effort, or other agreed-upon factors. Specify whether profit shares will be based on capital contributions, workload, or another metric.


3. Overlooking the Importance of Capital Contributions


Not specifying capital contributions and their implications can create friction among partners. Disparities in contributions can lead to disputes over ownership percentages, profit shares, and decision-making power.


  • To avoid issues, clearly state each partner's initial capital contribution, whether in cash, assets, or services. Include provisions on how additional capital contributions will be handled and what happens if a partner fails to meet their capital obligations. Section 22 of the Partnership Act 1961 deals with partnership property and should be referenced for clarity on asset ownership.


4. Lack of a Clear Dispute Resolution Mechanism


Disputes are inevitable in any business relationship. Without a predefined method for resolving conflicts, disagreements can escalate, potentially harming the partnership and its operations.


  • Include a dispute resolution clause specifying how conflicts will be handled, whether through mediation, arbitration, or another method. Section 30 highlights the duty of partners to render true accounts and full information, which can be a foundation for resolving financial disputes. Having a clear process for handling disputes can prevent conflicts from reaching court.


5. No Exit Strategy or Dissolution Plan


Partnerships can end for various reasons, such as retirement, death, or irreconcilable differences. A lack of an exit strategy or dissolution plan can lead to complications and legal battles over the division of assets and liabilities.


  • Sections 34-37 of the Partnership Act 1961 cover the dissolution of partnerships by expiration, notice, death, bankruptcy, or court order. To protect the interests of all partners, include provisions for voluntary withdrawal, procedures upon a partner’s death, and the process for dissolving the partnership. Define the distribution of assets and the handling of remaining liabilities.


6. Neglecting to Address Non-Compete and Confidentiality Issues


Partners may leave the partnership to start competing businesses or disclose sensitive information to outsiders, which can damage the original partnership's interests.


  • Include non-compete clauses that prevent partners from starting or joining competing businesses within a specified timeframe and geographic area. Section 32 of the Partnership Act 1961 states that a partner must account for profits if they compete without consent. Also, include confidentiality clauses to protect trade secrets, client lists, and other proprietary information.


7. Inadequate Clauses on Decision-Making Processes


Without clear guidelines on how decisions will be made, partners may find themselves in deadlock situations, particularly if there is an equal partnership.


  • Define decision-making processes in the agreement. Specify which decisions require unanimous consent, a simple majority, or a specific percentage of votes. Establish a mechanism for resolving deadlocks, such as a casting vote or third-party mediation. Section 26(h) provides that ordinary business matters can be decided by a majority of partners, but changes to the nature of the business require unanimous consent.


8. Ignoring Personal Liability and Indemnification Clauses


Partners may not be aware of the extent of their personal liability for partnership debts and obligations. Without proper indemnification clauses, partners could be exposed to personal financial risk.


  • Include clauses that outline the extent of each partner's liability and provide indemnification against certain risks. Section 11 states that partners are jointly liable for the firm's debts. Indemnification clauses can protect partners from being held personally responsible for the actions or negligence of other partners.


9. Failure to Regularly Update the Partnership Agreement


As the business grows and evolves, the partnership agreement may become outdated, leading to gaps in protection and unclear governance.


  • Regularly review and update the partnership agreement to reflect changes in business operations, partner roles, capital contributions, and other relevant factors. Section 21 allows the terms of the partnership to be varied by mutual consent. Keeping the agreement current ensures that it remains relevant and enforceable.


Conclusion: Building a Strong and Enforceable Partnership Agreement


A well-drafted partnership agreement is essential for the smooth functioning of a partnership and the protection of each partner's rights and interests. By avoiding common pitfalls, such as vague terms, inadequate dispute resolution mechanisms, and lack of clear roles and responsibilities, partners can create strong, clear, and enforceable agreements. Regular updates and legal reviews further ensure that the agreement remains aligned with the business's goals and legal requirements.


Engaging legal professionals to draft and review partnership agreements can provide invaluable guidance and help prevent costly disputes. Should you have any questions related to the article above, please do not hesitate to contact our managing partner, Eugene Yeong for clarification.

yeongassociates-home-cta-bg.png

Let's Protect What You've Built

Protecting your business doesn’t have to be complicated.

Grab our free guide to learn the essentials, or contact us to get started.

yeongassociates-logomark-white.png

Yeong & Associates

ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS

CONTACT  US:

Yeong & Associates

ADVOCATES & SOLICITORS

© 2025 Yeong & Associates. All rights reserved. Providing one-to-one, clear, and proficient intellectual property, trademark, employment law, startup legal guidance, and contract drafting services to entrepreneurs, innovators, and creative professionals in Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Putrajaya, Negeri Sembilan, Johor, and other states in Malaysia.

bottom of page